Design
Design does not meet planning controls
This can change development yield, consent pathway, purchase price, funding, construction cost, settlement timing, or legal risk. Treat it as a decision point, not background noise.
What it looks like
- Planner identifies breaches in height, yards, coverage, impervious area, outlook, outdoor living, access, or other controls.
- Concept yield cannot be supported without consent risk.
Likely causes
- Architect brief missed controls
- Survey information incomplete
- Yield target too aggressive
- Design changes not checked by planner
Immediate action
- 1Pause the affected decision or commitment until the issue is understood.
- 2Record the issue in the risk register with date, source, owner, and next action.
- 3Send the relevant documents to Planner, Architect, Surveyor and ask for written advice.
- 4Update feasibility, programme, budget, and decision register if cost, time, yield, consent, title, finance, or sales assumptions may change.
Step-by-step solution
- 1Define the problem in one sentence and identify which project decision it affects.
- 2Check the controlling documents: Concept design, AUP rule check, Topographical survey, Planning memo.
- 3Ask the responsible professional to confirm whether the issue is real, minor, manageable, or project-changing.
- 4List the available options: redesign, renegotiate, seek consent, add cost allowance, change programme, change sales strategy, or abandon.
- 5Price and programme each option using the current feasibility model.
- 6Make a written decision with source references and approval from the developer or project owner.
- 7Notify affected parties such as lender, lawyer, consultants, builder, agent, buyer, or council when required.
What not to do
- Do not rely on a seller, agent, or builder comment when a planner, lawyer, accountant, engineer, surveyor, valuer, lender, or council needs to confirm it.
- Do not hide the issue from the feasibility just because the project looked profitable yesterday.
- Do not waive due diligence, lodge consent, sign a contract, approve a variation, or promise settlement while the issue is unresolved.
- Do not give legal, tax, finance, planning, engineering, or council advice to others unless a qualified professional has confirmed it.
Verification
Source / where to check
Use current official information and the controlled documents for the actual project.
Check the operative plan, maps, zones, precincts, overlays, activity status, development controls, subdivision rules, and assessment criteria for the specific site.
Planner, surveyor, architect, engineer, quantity surveyor, lawyer, accountant, lender, valuer, real estate agent, and other project specialists must confirm site-specific decisions.
Project-specific consented documents and professional advice override generic guidance.
Cost impact
Medium to high if redesign reduces yield or adds consultant work.
Programme impact
Medium because redesign and planning review may be required.
Risk level
High
Compliance and contract impact
Check whether the issue changes the resource consent pathway or conditions, building consent documents, consultant scope, sale and purchase conditions, finance terms, construction contract scope, notice requirements, variation process, or settlement obligations.
Example email / decision wording
Subject: Design does not meet planning controls — advice and decision required. We identified this issue during concept design / planning review. The current evidence is listed in the attached record. Please confirm the controlling requirement, available options, cost/programme implications, further information needed, and whether any consent, contract, funding, or settlement action must pause. No assumption has been approved pending written advice.