BuildPath NZ logo

Planning

Consent and documentation review

Read the approved building consent like a construction instruction manual and identify every inspection, condition, certificate, amendment, and hold point.

consentdocumentationcouncilccc6 common tradesLast reviewed 11 August 2026

How to execute this stage

Micro-stage control plan

Work through each applicable step in order. A hold point means pause the dependent decision or work until the stated evidence and authorised review are complete.

3 structured steps
  1. 01Create a consent summary covering approved drawings, conditions, inspection list, requested certificates, producer statements, and LBP recordsLevel 1 · Planning
    TaskCheckHold pointEvidenceRecordNext action

    Simple explanation

    Create a consent summary covering approved drawings, conditions, inspection list, requested certificates, producer statements, and LBP records.

    Technical context

    Coordinate this work against Consented architectural drawings, Stamped project specification, the current consent status, and the actual site condition. Confirm interfaces before releasing dependent work.

    Why it matters: The main recorded risk is: Building from an old drawing. A missed check can create rework, delay, hidden defects, an inspection failure, or a departure from approved project documents.

    Prerequisites

    • Consented architectural drawings is current, approved for the intended use, and available to the people doing the work.
    • Stamped project specification and relevant product information have been checked.
    • Access, responsibility, safety controls, preceding work and the consent document review sequence are confirmed.

    Checks

    • Check the completed work against Consented architectural drawings and Stamped project specification.
    • Check specifically for: Building from an old drawing.
    • Avoid this known mistake: Only reading the plans and ignoring consent conditions.

    Evidence to save

    • Wide, location-identifying and close-up photographs of the completed consent and documentation review work before it is concealed.
    • Marked-up Consented architectural drawings or a precise drawing/detail reference.
    • Consent document review result, consultant record, trade QA record or written not-applicable reason.

    Hold point

    Do not cover, backfill, load, connect, certify or release the next activity until Consent document review and the required project evidence are complete or the authorised reviewer confirms what may proceed.

    Stop or escalate when

    • Building from an old drawing
    • Only reading the plans and ignoring consent conditions
    • The current drawing, approval, competent reviewer or required evidence cannot be confirmed.

    Documents and records

    • Consented architectural drawings
    • Stamped project specification
    • Current RFI/site-instruction/change record
    • Inspection and evidence register
    Cost effect
    Rectification, reinspection, delay, damaged follow-on work, access loss and changed scope can increase the cost of consent and documentation review. Record the cause and obtain written pricing before approving a commercial change.
    Programme effect
    This activity controls the release of dependent work. Update the lookahead programme and notify affected trades if the hold point, information, inspection or evidence is not ready.

    Next action

    Compare architectural, structural, civil, drainage, truss, cladding, waterproofing, H1, and product information for gaps or conflicts.

    Applicability: Apply when this work package is included in the current project scope. Confirm project-specific consent, contract, design, site and authority requirements.

    Use the current consented/issued project documents and competent site review. BuildPath does not approve work.

  2. 02Compare architectural, structural, civil, drainage, truss, cladding, waterproofing, H1, and product information for gaps or conflictsLevel 1 · Planning
    TaskCheckHold pointEvidenceRecordNext action

    Simple explanation

    Compare architectural, structural, civil, drainage, truss, cladding, waterproofing, H1, and product information for gaps or conflicts.

    Technical context

    Coordinate this work against Consented structural drawings, Council consent conditions, the current consent status, and the actual site condition. Confirm interfaces before releasing dependent work.

    Why it matters: The main recorded risk is: Council condition missed. A missed check can create rework, delay, hidden defects, an inspection failure, or a departure from approved project documents.

    Prerequisites

    • Consented structural drawings is current, approved for the intended use, and available to the people doing the work.
    • Council consent conditions and relevant product information have been checked.
    • Access, responsibility, safety controls, preceding work and the pre-construction meeting sequence are confirmed.

    Checks

    • Check the completed work against Consented structural drawings and Council consent conditions.
    • Check specifically for: Council condition missed.
    • Avoid this known mistake: Not checking amendments/minor variations.

    Evidence to save

    • Wide, location-identifying and close-up photographs of the completed consent and documentation review work before it is concealed.
    • Marked-up Consented structural drawings or a precise drawing/detail reference.
    • Pre-construction meeting result, consultant record, trade QA record or written not-applicable reason.

    Hold point

    Do not cover, backfill, load, connect, certify or release the next activity until Pre-construction meeting and the required project evidence are complete or the authorised reviewer confirms what may proceed.

    Stop or escalate when

    • Council condition missed
    • Not checking amendments/minor variations
    • The current drawing, approval, competent reviewer or required evidence cannot be confirmed.

    Documents and records

    • Consented structural drawings
    • Council consent conditions
    • Current RFI/site-instruction/change record
    • Inspection and evidence register
    Cost effect
    Rectification, reinspection, delay, damaged follow-on work, access loss and changed scope can increase the cost of consent and documentation review. Record the cause and obtain written pricing before approving a commercial change.
    Programme effect
    This activity controls the release of dependent work. Update the lookahead programme and notify affected trades if the hold point, information, inspection or evidence is not ready.

    Next action

    Set up the document control system so superseded drawings are removed from site.

    Applicability: Apply when this work package is included in the current project scope. Confirm project-specific consent, contract, design, site and authority requirements.

    Use the current consented/issued project documents and competent site review. BuildPath does not approve work.

  3. 03Set up the document control system so superseded drawings are removed from siteLevel 1 · Planning
    TaskCheckHold pointEvidenceRecordNext action

    Simple explanation

    Set up the document control system so superseded drawings are removed from site.

    Technical context

    Coordinate this work against Drainage drawings, Producer statement requirements, the current consent status, and the actual site condition. Confirm interfaces before releasing dependent work.

    Why it matters: The main recorded risk is: Inspection not booked before cover-up. A missed check can create rework, delay, hidden defects, an inspection failure, or a departure from approved project documents.

    Prerequisites

    • Drainage drawings is current, approved for the intended use, and available to the people doing the work.
    • Producer statement requirements and relevant product information have been checked.
    • Access, responsibility, safety controls, preceding work and the council inspection booking plan sequence are confirmed.

    Checks

    • Check the completed work against Drainage drawings and Producer statement requirements.
    • Check specifically for: Inspection not booked before cover-up.
    • Avoid this known mistake: Not creating a CCC evidence list early.

    Evidence to save

    • Wide, location-identifying and close-up photographs of the completed consent and documentation review work before it is concealed.
    • Marked-up Drainage drawings or a precise drawing/detail reference.
    • Council inspection booking plan result, consultant record, trade QA record or written not-applicable reason.

    Hold point

    Do not cover, backfill, load, connect, certify or release the next activity until Council inspection booking plan and the required project evidence are complete or the authorised reviewer confirms what may proceed.

    Stop or escalate when

    • Inspection not booked before cover-up
    • Not creating a CCC evidence list early
    • The current drawing, approval, competent reviewer or required evidence cannot be confirmed.

    Documents and records

    • Drainage drawings
    • Producer statement requirements
    • Current RFI/site-instruction/change record
    • Inspection and evidence register
    Cost effect
    Rectification, reinspection, delay, damaged follow-on work, access loss and changed scope can increase the cost of consent and documentation review. Record the cause and obtain written pricing before approving a commercial change.
    Programme effect
    This activity controls the release of dependent work. Update the lookahead programme and notify affected trades if the hold point, information, inspection or evidence is not ready.

    Next action

    Close the consent and documentation review stage, link its evidence, resolve outstanding defects and release only the next applicable stage.

    Applicability: Apply when this work package is included in the current project scope. Confirm project-specific consent, contract, design, site and authority requirements.

    Use the current consented/issued project documents and competent site review. BuildPath does not approve work.

Trade-to-trade control

Interfaces and release gates

Use the actual consented design, specification and authorised reviewers. These controls help expose gaps; they do not approve work.

Release this stage to the next team

Prerequisites

  • Current consented/contract documents and scope are available
  • Preceding work, access, safety and materials are ready
  • Named people own open RFIs, defects, inspections and evidence

Interface checks

  • Work matches the current documents and actual site condition
  • Interfaces with the preceding and following trades have been walked
  • Cost, programme, change and evidence consequences are recorded
Hold point: Do not cover, load, connect, backfill or release dependent work until the required reviewer accepts the stage or records an authorised exception.

Evidence before release

  • Location and detail photographs
  • Dated checklist/inspection/RFI references
  • Daily report and linked action/defect records

Next team: The next applicable project team

Open the related Workspace control →

What happens in this stage

  • Create a consent summary covering approved drawings, conditions, inspection list, requested certificates, producer statements, and LBP records.
  • Compare architectural, structural, civil, drainage, truss, cladding, waterproofing, H1, and product information for gaps or conflicts.
  • Set up the document control system so superseded drawings are removed from site.

Before work starts

  • Confirm the latest issued-for-construction and consented documents for consent and documentation review are on site, including Consented architectural drawings.
  • Check Stamped project specification, approved product data, RFIs, minor variations, and amendment status before work starts.
  • Confirm the subcontractor understands the scope, hold points, access, protection requirements, H&S controls, and quality evidence required.
  • Check the programme sequence so this stage does not start before earlier work, inspections, testing, or concealed-work photos are complete.
  • Confirm materials delivered to site match the specification, are dry/undamaged, and are stored according to manufacturer instructions.

During the work

  • Walk the work face early, mid-shift, and before close-up. Compare actual work with the consented drawings, specification, and manufacturer details.
  • Check set-out, levels, falls, clearances, penetrations, fixings, bracing, waterproofing, or protection points that will be difficult to see later.
  • Ask trades to show their own quality checks rather than only saying the work is complete.
  • Keep weather, site condition, delivery, delay, inspection, RFI, variation, and safety notes in the daily report.
  • Photograph any work before it is covered, backfilled, lined, clad, tiled, painted, or otherwise hidden.

After the work

  • Complete a close-out walk with the subcontractor and mark defects immediately while access is still available.
  • Confirm required inspection bookings, council results, producer statements, LBP Records of Work, warranties, test certificates, or installer declarations are obtained.
  • Update as-built notes where service routes, drainage, fixings, penetrations, or dimensions differ from the design.
  • Confirm the area is protected from weather, other trades, impact damage, contamination, or premature loading.
  • Update the lookahead programme and tell affected trades what is ready, what is blocked, and what must not be covered.

Common problems and step-by-step solutions

Conflicting drawings
  1. 1Stop the affected consent and documentation review activity if continuing could hide defective work, create unsafe work, or move away from the consented design.
  2. 2Photograph the condition from wide, medium, and close-up angles. Include a tape, level, datum mark, gridline, or drawing reference where useful.
  3. 3Check the latest consented architectural, structural, civil, services, and specification documents before giving an instruction.
  4. 4Ask the subcontractor to explain the cause, proposed fix, timing impact, and whether the fix changes consented work.
  5. 5Escalate to the builder/project manager, designer, engineer, council inspector, or client when the fix affects structure, weathertightness, drainage, H1, fire/safety, cost, programme, or consent.
  6. 6Record the decision, responsible person, drawing/RFI/variation reference, photos, and follow-up inspection in the daily report.
Missing detail
  1. 1Stop the affected consent and documentation review activity if continuing could hide defective work, create unsafe work, or move away from the consented design.
  2. 2Photograph the condition from wide, medium, and close-up angles. Include a tape, level, datum mark, gridline, or drawing reference where useful.
  3. 3Check the latest consented architectural, structural, civil, services, and specification documents before giving an instruction.
  4. 4Ask the subcontractor to explain the cause, proposed fix, timing impact, and whether the fix changes consented work.
  5. 5Escalate to the builder/project manager, designer, engineer, council inspector, or client when the fix affects structure, weathertightness, drainage, H1, fire/safety, cost, programme, or consent.
  6. 6Record the decision, responsible person, drawing/RFI/variation reference, photos, and follow-up inspection in the daily report.
Council inspection requirement unclear
  1. 1Stop the affected consent and documentation review activity if continuing could hide defective work, create unsafe work, or move away from the consented design.
  2. 2Photograph the condition from wide, medium, and close-up angles. Include a tape, level, datum mark, gridline, or drawing reference where useful.
  3. 3Check the latest consented architectural, structural, civil, services, and specification documents before giving an instruction.
  4. 4Ask the subcontractor to explain the cause, proposed fix, timing impact, and whether the fix changes consented work.
  5. 5Escalate to the builder/project manager, designer, engineer, council inspector, or client when the fix affects structure, weathertightness, drainage, H1, fire/safety, cost, programme, or consent.
  6. 6Record the decision, responsible person, drawing/RFI/variation reference, photos, and follow-up inspection in the daily report.

Verification

Source / where to check

Use current official information and the controlled documents for the actual project.

MBIE guidance explains that work should be built to the issued building consent, inspections must be managed, and records/certificates should be kept for CCC.

Use when a site change may require a minor variation or amendment before work continues.

Auckland Council explains local building consent processes, CCC, related certificates, producer statements, LBP notification, and whether resource consent may also be needed.

Consented drawings and specifications

The issued consent drawings, stamped specifications, engineering drawings, RFIs, minor variations, and amendments control the specific project.

Manufacturer specification

Use the exact current installation manual, warranty requirements, BRANZ/Appraisal information where applicable, and product data sheet for the product on site.

Insufficient data to verify

Insufficient data to verify — confirm against the current consented drawings, specifications, Auckland Council requirements, Auckland Unitary Plan, NZ Building Code, relevant NZ Standard, consultant advice, manufacturer instructions, insurance broker, insurer, lender, lawyer, accountant or project contract.

Project-specific consented documents and professional advice override generic guidance.

Common inspections required

  • Consent document review
  • Pre-construction meeting
  • Council inspection booking plan

Common risks

  • Building from an old drawing
  • Council condition missed
  • Inspection not booked before cover-up
  • Required certificate unavailable at CCC

Common mistakes

  • Only reading the plans and ignoring consent conditions
  • Not checking amendments/minor variations
  • Not creating a CCC evidence list early

Required documentation

  • Latest consented drawings and specifications
  • Relevant RFIs, site instructions, amendments, minor variations, and variation approvals
  • Subcontractor scope, QA checklist, delivery dockets, product data, and installation records
  • Inspection booking/result records and photos before cover-up
  • Daily site report notes covering labour, weather, progress, delays, risks, and decisions

Photos or diagrams needed

  • Wide photo showing where consent and documentation review is happening on the site
  • Close-up photos of critical details, fixings, laps, seals, penetrations, clearances, levels, or falls
  • Photo of product labels, batch numbers, delivery dockets, and installer marks where relevant
  • Marked-up drawing or simple diagram showing any changed location, clash, defect, or agreed remedial detail

Construction manager checklist

  1. 1Scope, drawings, specification, product data, and latest revision confirmed
  2. 2Trade briefed on hold points, tolerances to verify, evidence required, and inspection sequence
  3. 3Access, storage, protection, temporary works, and safety controls in place
  4. 4Work checked against drawings during installation, not only at completion
  5. 5Photos and records captured before work is concealed
  6. 6Defects, RFIs, delays, and variations recorded with owner and due date
  7. 7Inspection/producer statement/warranty/Record of Work requirements tracked for CCC

Questions to ask the subcontractor

  • Which drawing, detail, or manufacturer instruction are you working from?
  • What needs to be checked before this is covered or handed to the next trade?
  • What could stop you today: weather, access, materials, information, inspections, or other trades?
  • Does anything on site differ from the drawings or specification?
  • What evidence will you provide for the quality file and CCC file?

Red flags to stop work

  • Work differs from consented drawings or specification and no approved variation/RFI exists
  • A structural, weathertightness, waterproofing, drainage, fire/safety, or H1 detail is unclear
  • The trade wants to cover work before inspection, testing, or photos are complete
  • Specified materials are missing, substituted, damaged, wet, expired, or installed outside manufacturer instructions
  • A safety control is missing for excavation, heights, plant movement, electrical work, asbestos, silica, or public protection

What to record in the daily report

  • Exact location and quantity of work completed
  • Trade headcount, company names, plant used, deliveries, and material batch/product details
  • Weather, site conditions, delays, instructions received, RFIs raised, and inspections booked/passed/failed
  • Photos taken before cover-up and any defects or non-conformances found
  • Next-day lookahead, blockers, and who is responsible for each action

Use this in my project

Turn consent and documentation review into controlled action

Open the relevant workspace register, create the project-specific record, link the controlling documents and preserve evidence. The guide does not automatically approve or verify the action.

Open workspace